The houses' of Parliament is under Queen and country, it is an absolute-underhanded state of affairs'.

It is a disgraceful issue that such a beautiful church of worship can be used for tactical play, it is without doubt that the church should return to its' original-religious-ordinational house of God and worship.

Politics' can be centered literally anywhere in the country, but for political powers' to take over the rights' of the religion of her Majesty's appointed main house of worship, is nothing more then foul play, and should be handed back with immediate grace of ownership to her Majesty's ordination of affairs' and worship, with religion at the forefront of country, and be dismantled without further ado.

It is a complete disgrace, that the state of politics' have been allowed to own partnership of what was once a main house of worship, and with the times' of movement, we are all aware of the historical facts' surrounding the taking over of the main church and handing it to the political-men who were once extremely religious, with greed taking over they lost the direction of Faith of what now have turned towards' rather the laws' of the land.

The members' of Parliament will downsize and return the church to its' former house of worship, without delay, in the time and age we are now transgressing there is little chance of attack on what could be once again a source of strength for the land.

In return for this I would ask in grace, that statuettes' and statues' of all iconic figures' be dismantled, rather names' of the religious people be put in their place of resurrection, highlighting the figures' and or personal plights' with plaques', for their and their directional religious path. No statues.

If all churches' are returned to there main source of worship, I would also ask for the same directional actions' to be taken in the regards of the statues', after all it is the Father of all creation that you are worshiping, not the pure people that descended thereafter to fight diplomatic and or disputes' within the church its-self.

Statues of Oliver Cromwell and other iconic figures' should be placed in the British museum of historical facts' where by they truly belong', not situated outside a main house of worship, where beautiful flowers, tulips' and or roses', should be situated instead.

It is with this that there should be an immediate resolution of affairs'.

I hope that this will resolve the long disagreements' of the change of faith of the Queen of England, and that the country be shared on these set-straight boundaries'.

We will exchange the Sunday ringing of the bells' across the lands', for the adhans' to be called on time on a daily basis, it's your choice.

I think that's fair enough.

Statues' of Christ be exchanged for flower beds in places' of worship and buildings' of worship, as statues can be obtained in smaller versions' in other religious' out letting shop's that merchandise in iconic figurines'. I would suggest that all married women cover their hair regardless of religion, bandannas' and small scarfs' are acceptable, for the exchange of simple wooden cross's without iconic-statues that resemble any worshiping figure. As for non married women, I would propose that they cover , with modest fittings', covering breast areas' with scarfs' and bottom areas' with loose fitting tops' that fall below their butt line. This understanding and advice applies only to those people who have a lesser understanding of Islam. For people who have a deeper understanding and or stronger religious conviction in the heart, then this dress law of advice, would not apply to them.

As for Scotland, I told you guys' before, I don't know much about the political history, rather suggestions' need to be brought forward, as so I can give a verdict of
situation.

I would suggest that Parliament share power under the proposed agreements;' and that the agreements' will not be altered under any circumstances'. If agreements are altered and there is an underhanded up-rise of religion, there-by I will reserve the right to sieze control of the Parliament building and decide thereafter handlings'.

If Scotland so wishes to have it's place of border high-lighted as a separated move, I cant see what benefit it will do in regards' to the unification project of faith and countries', rather the Queen of Scotland should look into my list of work and try to resolve religious and political issues' from my guidelines', providing we stay as a unified Continent of Great Britain, after all that is what we are famed for.

It is not that I wish to control Scotland, rather it would be a bad move to suddenly suggest the breaking's' of ties' that have been founded over many years' of workings' and establishmentations'.

As for dissolving Scottish Parliament, in exchange for religion, I would have to know about it.

Sorry sometimes' adjustments' need to be made in regards' to advice and or rulings', most of the advice I give would work if applied and adhered to, befitting and slight adjustments' to establish really good faith ties' and unity bondings' between people.

And it is without doubt that some people just don't wish to compromise, putting the whole agenda of faith, work and unity, on the hit list for demolishment, severing ties' deliberately to antagonise the bonding of people, politics' and religion, rather it should be, people and faith unity, because religion outweighs politics' by miles'.