Christianity

A life for a life, and a tooth for a tooth

Yes I agree with that, if you have, by deliberate nomination, killed someone with an instrument or an act of brutality, by physically killing that person, without just cause.

Then yes.

But to take someones' life, on the be chance of a circumstance, that never had anything to do with brutality or even the circumstance was by means' of effect, had taken place before a birth of a child, then you are infact, taking someones' life without just cause, and therefore, if you have taken a life by means' of enslavement and punishment, it should be your life also taken, if you believe what your doing is right, that is.

Rather, the responsibility is in the hands' of all the people that surrounded the individual and or the individuals', and or persons' and or, environment they were subsequently brought up in.

Thus if there is no father, and the father has abandoned the family unit, then the mother has the main priority of her children at hand, and should therefore safe-guard her children to the best of her ability, by means' of hardship and struggle. And the same instance for the father. It is not because there is an absence of a relative that the children will go astray, rather, the environment of the present family unit will determined the outcome of the development of the children.

Therefore it is a ridiculous notion to claim a life for a life, within the marriage bonds' and or marriage breakdowns' of unity.

And thus enforcing another religious sect, to except these unfounded beliefs', of what are imposed, is in its-self an oppression of humanities' rights' of religious values', and rather you will be enforcing everyone to obtain a standard of manipulated christian values.

A life for a life and a tooth for a tooth.

It is for a reason to subsequently stop brutality.