Friday 21 May 2010

The Spanish Shooting

The guilt of knowing that her partner had committed crimes' of sexual natures', on minors'; would be enough to disturb anyone of us.

It is without doubt that after an investigation from the Spanish authorities', there was conclusive evidence that her partner had been involved in such atrocious affairs' of this nature.

It is with this that she gave due thought to the well-care of her childrens' future in regards' to reprimands' from society, towards' and on them.

If she had let them live, what quality of life would they of had ?, I am not making excuses' for her, rather the chances' are, in this matter of affairs', her own children would have be subjected to the care of the Spanish authorities'.

It is a proven fact that half, maybe even more abuses' on children take place in the care of social authorities; as in the presence of the own home environment. And as a mother she undoubtedly, couldn't bare the thought of her children subjected to such abuses' under a systemic-system of unfair and bias care foundations' of what governments, hasn't really any control over the accreditation of the workers' that apply for and or are scrutinised under the health and safety units' of children taken into such systems'. The chances' are that half of the members' of care organisations' are interested in finding out children for their own sexual perverse thoughts' and or game play, and or any abuses' that they find to stimulate their own desires of perversions'.

Having to live with the fact that her partner, had participated in such acts', without her knowledge, and then faced with the prospects' of blame and unconditional torture of questioning, was she apart of his scheme ?. Then subjected to this such questioning, the children would have undergone news-paper invasions', witness protection schemes', of what could have many other impacts' on them in their course of future. So she took it upon herself to decide that, it was possibly better for her children, that she took their lives', rather, then after an eighteen year period, of subjectivity of abuses' within the care system, and or hounding by people who have revenge natures', and or other unknown factors', that could be attributed to their plight of pain. She took the decision that rather then her own children subjected to unknown ordeals, after an eighteen year period of punishments' from society and or torture and or abuses' from inside jobs', that she would end their lives' now, rather then them ending it after a period subjected to many different kinds' of other abuses'.

There is no excuse, and I am not excusing her, rather I am putting her case forward, from the eyes' of a mother that might one day find herself and or hope not to rather, be in that same predicament.

Rather; through the state of affairs' related to the circumstances of her husbands' abuses' and or crimes', she reacted in response to a desperate situation that devastated her, and thinking in-line with the consequences' of her children, she subsequently acted without rational and impulse of conclusive thinking that this way out for them was better then the route of care where subsequently many different kinds of abuses' and revenges' take place on innocent children, who have no part in their parents' crimes' and or no understandings' of their parent s' and or parent crime.

So on impulse of desperation, she acted erratically, to establish a form of subtle euthanasia.

No comments:

Post a Comment