The ruling for the entering of someone else's house, is:

That, if you have permission from the house owner to enter the property, then it isn't an illegal entry, however, the spouse should take into consideration that his wife and or partner, may not be in a respectable dress of codes'....and that a wife and or spouse under usual circumstance, wouldn't expect that her spouse and or partner and opr husband, to pass the house keys' over to another individual before being informed, as an decency of bodily exposures can occur in visual terms upon entry of the third party.

In that, the third party, should make their presence aware before entry into the appropriate building.

And in that, because the situation was out of and or brought out of its usual content, meaning this particular situation never occurred before, by entry of permissions of other spouse without informing the second spouse, then the acknowledgement of the third party would not be obvious at first hand, as it is completely out of the blue and or character of the first partner to let this occurrence happen. Therefore to state the unobvious, it would impact the mind not to acknowledge the situation at first glance, and thereafter, a mistake and in carriage of justice would thereafter take place in respects' to in approriations of un -intentional bodily exposures'.....therefore to state, that the neighbours didn't train there children first, to refuse such invitations into another house, without informing the legal first spouse, and therefore the education of such a child and irresponsibility's' should full on them...the neighbours'.