As you all know, a man can marry a wealthy woman; now in Islam, wealth is associated with the wealth of knowledge and other wealth sources, too, because with the benefit of knowledge usually comes other gains of wealth.

There are two kinds of marriages'

There is the marriage, whereby both partners' are looking for extra incomes' and are both deceptive and oppressors', in this, the man usually obtains a status whereby he will carry out corrupted means of extortion's' in that marriage for other gains'. This only becomes Halal, if that monetary gain is being used for the right purpose of intention, at the benefiting of other needy and or religious wealth of buildings' of donations' and or to bring their own family and or other families in close unity with them, out of extreme poverty's and to bring about the adherence of religious educations'.

Then there is the marriage, whereby the partner or spouse is religious, and they are living under an oppressor of wealth gains' for the sole purpose of wealth accumulations', that have nothing and or no barrings on any intentional deeds' only the satisfaction of their own greed of wealth and wordily pleasures', this is when the shame of judgement will befall them, if the wealth is of no benefit of any protective and or any securities of purpose from other oppressing regimes', and the intention of the wealth for benefiting any non religious justifications', is there, then this shame will be exposed. And Allah knows best.

Then there is the marriage, whereby the woman has vasts amounts of religious and other benefiting knowledge's', whereby in Islam the rule and education of the children will fall solely on them as a leader of the house, and or disciplines' and or other authoritarian roles' will fall on them, because of this knowledge, thus the man becomes the lessor and declines in his leaderships', but this is an unjust fatwa. As Khadja was vastly knowledgeable in wordily wealthy matters but Mohammad still remained the leader of the whole of the ummah, He was not versed in wealth accumulations' and neither did it interest him...pbuh

This fatwa of the roles' of leaderships in women over men because of Islamic knowledge and is only for the benefit of practising adhering Muslims', (non religious and other identities of disputing powers of equal rights in democracy is invalid as this is restricted to family unity and in formations of religious educations in Islam in its-self, as a clarity to regulations of deen purposes') thus this fatwa of roles of leaderships is in it's self a mis information....and that, knowledge has many branches', and that the woman can be versed in many educations, but can have downfalls' in areas', and then she can also be more advancing in liberties of educations then the man, but then the man maybe more educated in other branches' of life skills' and experiences too, whereby he is better at certain roles' and educated more in certain areas of life and religion, whereby even the woman needs him as a male persona to take the role of leaderships'...as the male role and leaderships of disciplines and or other rules', whereby even if the woman, is a world leader, she herself needs the help of a male spouse leader to maintain her feminism's', and that by being given sole status of leaderships' because of educational advances over the man, relieves her of her feminism's', therefore, she resembles the man, thus this fatwa is then disallowed and ruled out, and the man remains the prayer leader and the leader of the children, in religious matters too, as the children need religious education and a sound male leader for guidance, even if the woman is more versed, he needs to take on his male rights of leaderships, of teaching.....thus the woman falls back, and corrects any mistakes' at a letter given time, away from the ears of the children, thus not discrediting his manhood and authorities'.

So, even if she is doing all the criteria of the deen aspects', the role of feminism's has to be maintained and remain, the man is first in leaderships' of prayer and other areas of responsibilities' where she downfalls', and or he has the internal household rights of disciplines over the children, and her, if used correctly, even though she maybe advancing in religious duties then himself,though he is religious, he needs to take his stand as the leader in the house, dispute the advancing Reading and or other of the woman.

However, if there is then a divorce, the woman will be given the rights of religious educations and rights of child care, because of her advances'.


I think that covers it.