The statement was; that I did not identify with the product, and therefore Left the product with the appropriate person, and the appropriate person dealt with my request with a described dispute over the aliment of condition.

And that No terms of contracts was exchanged to suggest that the discussion was a bribery and or intent to bribe and rather, the product is in the hands of the necessary person to deal with it appropriately in its entity; and that letters of recognition was produced on request of circumstance and no other person was present to claim otherwise, or in the case of, inappropriate watching of events' goes against the patient confidentiality clause of conditions' and any claims to suggest otherwise is a false interpretation of eventualities' and therefore has to be dismissed with immediate effect.

For people who identify and or who have had problems with the clause of effect and or rumours' of bribe with intent to extract or extort money from people who have had presciption issued and claims have been made under bribery effectiveness for media payments.