Wednesday, 13 October 2010

Mustapha Taleb

A once detainee of Belmarsh-Prison, denied all known legal-rights to defend himself in light of evidence that is apparently being with-held from his legal representative.

1. Without viewage of such evidence, Mr Taleb's legal representative and family can not, assume that Mr Taleb was involved in any events and or other involvements of associated-criminality's that he has been and or is being accused of.

2. Mr Taleb's representative can only presume that such evidences do not exist, under the circumstance by the authorities of higher powers to refuse such access'.

3. A illegal act by the interim administrations of office of legal advice bureau and or other, to act on behalf of all British Citizens' in light of a fair-trail campaign, a breech of systemic British law and an illegal indictment of a British Citizen.

4. All known charges dropped.

So why is it that Mr Taleb is still being held under super-vision and none associations of family members and or friends'.

5. This is a clear violation of his legal rights' of bureaucratic advices and is in fact an illegal indictment and infringement of his condition of circumstance of refusements of allowance to see any of his legal papers' stating otherwise.

And that all legal members of advice bureaucracy can only presume that there is non and or the evidence is inconclusive, and that Mr Taleb should be allowed to return to a normal life-style and condition of affairs', residing and living and returning to his normal conditions of affairs'.

Subjected to a renewed address, and disclosures of accounts sealed after re-remittance of legalities'.

No comments:

Post a Comment