Randie Winston

20 years of age, no prior adult history-
Of conviction.

Residing in Cleveland Heights', was involved in a skirmish and or altercation of events that could have been incitement and or aggravated-fundamental-racism; by a formal-postal-worker, who operated the area in question.

There was no credible witnesses' to the altercation that took place, in regards to verbal communication of statements', nor was there any factual evidence that Randie Winston was involved in theft and or attempted thief only on the pro-mise of visual sight and not actual factual accounts of verbal statements' and or verbal addressing of what took place that day.

Being a plain-man with no prior-history, questions have to be asked about what events led to a mistaken-shooting, or nervous-jolting-resulting in a miss-pull and or accidental-trigger-strike, that would seem to be far from the objective and or reasoning's' to why this event took place at the first hand, with the evidence put forward by the prosecution of effective-summary.

The mere fact that the statements given and made do not correlate the events of the actions undertaken is a major floor by the defence put forward by the prosecution department of correctional-faculties'.

1. The department states', that the intention was to participate in a daylight robbery ?

Daylight-Robbery ?

In a well-lit area ?

With spectator-viewage ?


Evidence of theft-inconclusive?

With no substantial accounts of factual-robbery ?

No evidently-theft

No items missing, then what ?.. .

As the justice department quite rightly know, it is not uncommon and rather common to carry weapons on the streets of the American-united states of liberty.

And that on occasions' mistakes' of daylight arguments can break-out, with a misintentional-strike-made in a line of threat without-intent. And a mis-appropriated shot incited by accidental-movement and or badgering of the defendant-who clearly used a formal of deterrent of aggression, be it racism-incitement and or other.

And as the department of justice quite clearly knows', that racism is not un-common on the streets of America and rather it is at an all time high in segregated black areas' of residence.

And nothing, rather ignore and or miss -presume, was under-taken by the prosecution in light of all of the above facts given,
rather facts' of events that by seem to be a bias campaign against a man that has had no previous history, and that the evidence needs to be reassessed-in coherence with this statement put forward by His legal representative and reviewed, before a mis-carriage of justice is undertaken, on a man that was intending to go about his daily business-like the rest of the community, and that events of an unsuspecting nature took him by surprise and caught him off-guard provoking him to issue his apparent threat of defence without the intent to usage of weaponry attack.

And that after the jolt of mis-taken shooting, Winston return home, obviously shaken by what had occurred and scared stiff.

Does this sound like a cold blooded thief-murderer.

In light of the circumstance and with refinement of the case, we will be asking for a reduction and a fresh start, a 40 year sentence seems' very harsh in light of the circumstances put forward by his defence team.

We will be looking for a two year community service, working with victims' of murderous crimes' in a supportive campaign to encourage empathy for his actions' of what are not defined as a intent and or a crime or viscous-intended-malice.