Ironwood state prison

It appears that the jurisdiction and response to claimants' of injustices' and mis-appropriated evidences' are too many and too often in regards to the American institutional jury of principles'.

Doing some general research, I have noted that more often then not, the prisoners' are given the wrong sentence in-line with the evidences and assumptions made and put forward by the official prosecutions', and in light of the poverty that is apparent between classes' of backgrounds', and more often then not, prisoners are sentenced because they can not afford to apply for reasonable legal aid and or legal services'.

Exceptions' should be made for entry and excess to such prisoners' documentations' for, countries' that have and are able to identify what persons and or personnel pose a threat to the immediate society at hand.


Whereby officials can then pass regulations' over to legal aid representatives' who are willing to work on voluntary bases's to relieve the immediate pressure of floored systemic and or unreasoned sentencing without finance to support such people who deserve liberty.

Over-sights and floors in the system are far too many, and far too often.

Attainability to story searches and wikki on history to in-mates should be available and accredited to appropriate-personnel who have the time and energy to pick out the immediate cases' that have had injustices and wrong sentencing handed to them.