Thursday 29 December 2011

Laura Croft

Tomb Radar

Anniversary

Legal Team representative:

Administrations' advisory:

Three legal case hearings set up against a oppositional company in relationship to the copy righted licencing of this particular programme:

Rights to appeal the action taken in relationship to the accusation that Laura Croft was or is a direct imitation of Linda Hamilton.

1.First court hearing appeal is based on the illegal entry of phone tapping and inquiry to personal conversations that are to be categorised as general topic conversations and not factual accounts of direct accuracies'.

Compensations rights of personal invasion:

Compensations rights of mass equity loss:

Compensations rights to loss of company credits and accreditation's:

1. To set up a court hearing based on a conversation that was directly taken from one person who commented generally in relation to this image creation.

2. That the person in question, didn't know that the conversation had been taken to and or as a literal accounting, and then used as an illegal entry in the courts of laws'.

3. That the phone tapping was an illegal entry and shouldn't have been admitted into court without valid authorisations' of the person who gave a general commentary on this production of gaming entry

4. Damages for personal invasion, and use of conversations without authorisations of the person in question.

5. Damages for the loss of equities in firm productions and monetary amassing'.

6. Damages towards company employees and production graphic creators'.

7. Damages for the accusation that tomb radar was a direct copy of Indiana Jones', when infact and with accuracies', is a complete fabrication assaulted by the oppositional company.

Reasons listed:

1a. That the programme was a complete original gaming tactic creation

2b. That the creation of this programme was based on puzzles' and mazes' that far outweigh in and advancing in, mental arithmetic's then that of a simple adventure story, that bares on comparisons' of similarities' to the story production of Indiana Jones' that was set in transits' modes and vehicle modes, that was also set on 80% outdoor excursion by way of production and story editing'.

While assuming Goldberg's dinosaur production, then if he takes this to court, then the schools can take him to court. In that thereafter underlining, the rule has been further explained below.

3c. Laura Croft was and had been graphically imposed on a direct circular image of pinpointed orientations' created by a simple prototype in school by the person also in question, and that other companies by legal entry brought this copy righted material of creations'.

4d. That every story will have similar experiences of factual contents', seen that we are all living humanities experiences together, that may appear to be a copy righted plagiarism, to the effect of a few lines that might incur similarities', but under the legal representations of inquiry, if it is not a direct match of 100% and is only thought to be, and or assumed to be, without calculated strong points of entry, than the case is invalid.

No comments:

Post a Comment