Ike Turner-Tina Turner

Taking back his family name

It is with the sounding of the turner name, in relation to the two T' status that apparently-hooked a catch.

With the building up of the family industry with the strength of Ike turners' name, it is only fair to state that half the proceeds', despite accusations' and or domestic abuses', should alternately determined that all family members' involved on Ikes' side should receive a 50% share of the use of his name in regards' to the profit that Tina received from such an investment. It was with-his name that she built her whole identity persona. Thus to exclude Ikes' family from all shares' of proceeds', is in it's self a rip-off in affairs of monetary funds'.

If Tina hated Ike as much as she claimed, and that he attacked her on more then several occasions', then she wouldn't have been able to manage herself as well as she had done, with vast amounts' of gigs' on the horizon, bookings' and family life to attend to, things' may not be quite like what she states or accuses'.

If Tina so hated Ike, why then would she continue to carry his family name, with a continual form of extreme abuse the first thing any fair seeming woman would do, is rid herself of all identity of her former partner and or association by de-pole of effect, to carry her maiden name. As money was an extreme benefactor, and an opportunity to have 100% profit, it untimely looks' like she cut it, by means' of greed and deception, to take center stage, thus betraying Ike, ripping him off in his association of business- that he built up-carrying Tina, then by means' of escape to cut out the boredom of family life, and living with a good male counterpart, she ultimately took advantage. Ikes' family deserve a cut in the use of their family name or she should discontinue his family name, as it was with the counter-part of identity by association that she made her claim to fame.

If she so wishes', without the arrangement of court proceedings' taken against her, then she would be able to keep it, but to cut his well earned establishment of effect out, and making a clear cut of association only creates' the impression that it was an effect of she will take it all, and leave ike and his family without any cut, thus portraying her as the greedy tike she really is.

I reserve the right to my own personal opinion on my views', and have not been encouraged by any one to give a personal verdict on the situations, rather an exploitation is an exploitation, and it should be resolved by appropriation of fair cuttings' of the investment of the shared Ike name.

Ike Turner and Tina Turner

Counterpart-of association, thus she wasn't Turner before the production company that Ike built, thus with association they became a duet.

Thus it should be-drop the name; or give the appropriations of a 50% cut for the establishment of the turner name. Once divorced she-had no rights' over the legality of the turner name in regards' to using it as a production of business value. And thus because she used it as a business association, the cuts' should be made with immediate effect.