Abu Qatada; another unfairly stigmatised Muslim Cleric

There seems' to be unsurety about an apparent fret that old man, Qatada is, or will have on any national and international community, if he is subsequently released.

There are discrepancies' in the detention of Abu Qatada's imprisonment, first he was released under house arrest, whereby he was allowed to reside with his family, under extreme conditions' of enclosure.

Subject to breaching his bail conditions', whereby he took his children to a play area to express his family rights'-not being able to have contact with outside solicitors' to appeal against the decision made to home confinement, he was automatically sent back to the category A' belmarsh prison, whereby now; under convenience of re-arrest; the against party- have issued a warrant for him to be extradited to Jordan, I believe.Taking advantage of the given situation.

Questions' have to be asked, how can a old man under house detention be thrown back into a category A' imprisonment for breaching his bail conditions', by only taking his children to the park. If the breech was- a contact with a militant group and or associations', then I could clearly understand why the courts' would rule in this favour, but as it was a gentle breech to spend time with his family as a old man, who has aged due to pressures' from outside enforcements' of higher powers', it doesn't add up to a reasonable and just- judgement call. Rather; when he was under house detention, he wasn't a threat nor did he participate in any thing that resembled such activities' and rather he was practising fatherhood-over good period of time, after the alleged allegations'.

It is a well known fact that chechnyan muslims were under extreme pressures' from outside forces', facing war against a supreme nation of military force, the donations of money was a small contribution for self defence-to in-able innocent men to defend themselves' from falling victim to the unslaughterous war crimes' that been now after many years-documented in historical reports', whereby mass-murder and rape rampages took place on innocent families' who resided on their land, it was a war about the rights' of ownership of land, whereby the chechnyans' refused to move off theland that they had resided on for many years'. Building up their homes' and farms' and work. It was not a ploy to incite racial discrimination, rather it was a little support whereby no-body else was brave enough to help, nor was it an act of terrorism, it was a just-a part aid to restrict the or try to restrict the incoming military deployment of what had and is documented as a disastrous accounts' of slaughterers history that one really wouldn't expect in this day and age.


He should be returned to his family, and released back into society, by means' of slow re-introduction of effect, as there seems' to be, in this case, a continual release and re-arrest, over and over again. It seems' that the authority are picking at strews' because of his first appeal to reside in the uk under the asylum act of protection, of what then had devastating effects' on his character, rather the authorities' have picked him out and continually assumed and placed untold pressure on a guy that has been seen to be a family man, who just wishes for his life to be returned to a normal status of effect, on the -pro-mise that he will not feel guilty and aid poor war stricken muslim who have no other defence in the future.