Roma families'

Al-jazzier' least news'

It would be more befitting, it the state was to sponsor one child from each family, to learn, with two options', the labour path, or the academic path.

Allowing the families to decide what is the best form of education for the welfare of their families'.

With this sponsorship, the oldest son of each family, would be able to re-build and help maintain the situation of their own families'.

With a sponsorship of a one child scheme, where they go from the home in the morning via a bus, and return in the evening to their own environments, their families' will grow with them in regards' to mentality, once educated and placed in employment they will be able to improve their own families' conditions'.

And the skills' these children will learn, will have a positive effect on the mind-set of their own members' of families'.

The children will have to agree that whatever income they gather from the scheme will go to the family unit and thereafter, they will be able to start their own family unit, within or next to their existing one.

But to say, it would be better to take all the children and place them in state run boarding school, of where they will lose all ties' with other members' of their families' is preposterous. It will cause utter disturbance and resentment.

It will not help their situation, while a majority will be in state led institutions', the families left behind, will carry on and persist in their old ways'.

I propose the best solution would be the sponsor solution. It would benefit their own communities' and tidy the communities from inside-out. And saving the governments' huge amounts' of money on state led boarding schools' of where many abuses can take place, it is a disaster waiting to happen.