It seems' idiotic to be thinking about any more space programmes that cost billions' of pounds' to generate, when there are so many issues' of poverty that need to be covered first.

If issues of poverty are covered, and the world sorts' out its' own problems' of deprivation, then money can be ploughed into extravagant space programmes', until that day comes' the world isn't in the position to be focusing on such projects'.

America are talking about sending people into space when their people are dying earlier and earlier of obesity, it is hypocritical.

It would be better to plough money into the investments' of ozone projects and mission to reduce admissions', then to be exploring surfaces' that are no where ready for exploration.

It would be better if the world reserves' a few (million pounds') every few years' while developing designs', graphic techniques' and more advanced technologies', then when the ideas are more advanced with a better placement of lower poverty, then missions' into space can be explored with more focus on the beautiful creation of our solar system, as for right now, it is not appropriate, with war zones'-poverty and injuries that have been produced by the third world war, that it really isn't the time and or predicaments to be addressing such extravagant ideals and showoff schemes'.