The latest commentary from reporting on the Libyan situation

In reference to a comment made in relation to:

" This is a pretty difficult Game-Play that Libya is under-taking ".

The choice of words used in this report of effects about our situation is most profound, under the circumstance, where a small section of our people have revolted against the sound periodic regime, that has sustained powers of controls', have participated in UN activities, have met with world leaderships over numerous years of talks' and diplomacy, to be attacked in this way by the under-lying international community is just completely impartial to the former stance that we have up-help in the world, previously.

Seemingly being attacked by the international community, for reasons unclear.

You claim that we have breached humanitarian abuses', forgetting to mention that, the protesters up-rose in an unfair campaign of extreme violence and revolt, causing death by un-tolerable violence and other.

When we deploy and under-take Fair easy control measures that put civilians at a lessen risk then your proposals', you still insist to try to make forwarding advances?

We ask you this?

Why?

GAME PLAY reference of use of words', is not appreciated and unacceptable on an international standard, when our people, even if it is a small part of them who are effetely in revolt, are dying, by causing their own violence and hostage under-takings- trying to seize governments of control by force, by implementing measure of murder and other.

This is GAME PLAY?

When we are trying to off hold rebels that can be a further damage to internal communications of affairs and other, if given powers of control standard.