We are not waving our hands in the air, being wobbly about oil facts', we have stated what is on offer and we mean what we state.

In this, we also have a query, why the international community wishes' to strike our armed military powers', that do not pose a direct threat to any out side force of other country and or holdings, further afield?

We need to have access, like all other super powers' of controlling wealth distributions and Major contracting of exports', access to our armed deployments', in case of an unprecedented illegal up-rising of small sections of opposition rebel forces', who are trying to hold the state at a current hostage situation, of continuation in murdering their own neighbouring people, and that our defence is being used to cull the rebels' from furthering harm on innocent people, pro and or anti government civilian's that were merely side-standers on protests of more well-developing natures at the being of a minor revolt in Libya.

However; the rebels have instigated this....and from our defence of literature you can quite clearly see, who is in the wrong, do you wish for these people, who are threatening their own neighbours', murdering their own neighbours and trying to destabilize and hold us aa good fair government, at hostage, to be placed in controlling powers', what will the consequence be, on the rest of us...?

And outside influence of other lands', who knows what they will be capable of, if given powers of controls?....

You need to re-think this very carefully.

You clearly are blind to who is in error here.