We are stating that even though we have chosen to up hold a ceasefire at present, in relation to the pressing concerns that Europe have about our re-deployment managements that are quite frankly more sufficient and promising then your own, that presumes to kill and strike against the whole of Libya in the name of protection.

We will break ceasefire ties' of promises' if the rebels' pose a direct threat to ourselves' and or our lives' in relation to a violent breach of conduction on part of their side.

You continue to talk about forces deployments', is that a promise to war?

If that is the case, then you are equally and even more brutal in your approaches than ourselves' who promise to deal with this in a appropriate manner of minimum death rates and good interests of well-care for our captives'.....


This is, the situation, you only promise to kill, Mame and canonise our land, in the name of protection, when you know that another promise to go to war, in another way of use of linguistics is what you are really pushing for.

You can not justify any interventions'.

The only interventions we will allow, is media access, and Charity and aid, until our negotiations have been met for fair trade deals'.

And does that make you an ally to terror, in an unnamed war programming of linguistic deployments of forces' that will see to thousands of deaths all across Libya, then you claim I am not working in the best interest of my people, and my land.

When you threaten to kill all in the name of oil distributions for free....AGAIN!