I would usually keep to a seven day proposal of word promises' , but seen that you are extremely pressuring me, then you leave me no option but to put my defence forward, I will be defending the rights of Conrad Murry and a appeal of innocent until proven otherwise, with full adequate body of evidence that this man is completely guilty of the crime set out against him as proposed ,murder and or homicide.

Facts stated and misappropriated in the courts of law, in a misleading context that haven't been added and or have been left out by the prosecution, by deliberated pretences', by the, against jury hosting a programme against Conrad Murry, important facts that could change the verdict with a swift pace of descriptive writing explanations', thus the next stated facts will be placed forward in light of Conrad Murry's defence programme of forwarding solicitor statements' of accounts', with sound proofing that he was the sole benefactor to the death of Micheal Jackson, without justification to accuse the defendant of this crime. A crime that can foresee the death penalty imposition installed.

1. There was a first autopsy on Micheal Jackson, results withheld from the defence party in relation to Conrad Murry.
1.The family requested that a full autopsy by, yet another coroner, meaning that a full autopsy of the body had been done and completed already.

2. Without satisfaction of these result the family sort to arrange for another independent autopsy coroner to carry out yet another full investigative autopsy that once again bared none conclusive results of homicide, meaning that, the appropriated independent, best solicitor coronor was appointed from this aerial town to carry this autopsy out, foul played was entirely ruled out on both occasions of detailed laboratory consults of the medical profession. In fact, the second autopsy showed that there was no trauma suffered and or no foul played found when he and his team investigated the preserved body of Micheal Jackson.

4. And that, the prosecution are not versed in the medical profession, and that they are only putting forward testimonial witnesses', of other patient doctorate accounts that have no apparent barrings on this case out hand.

5. After this statement was issued and the examination results were passed to and on on to other official members of councils' and tribunals' that are also little in versed medical readings and doctorate papers', rather their association is with the town halls' and other laws of justice systems', that pass own verdicts of self opinionated documentations of statements that are highly invalid, in such case' therefore to state, with the two autopsy's already carried out on Micheal Jackson, both concluding same non foul play and or other stated terms of non corrupting handling's', there shouldn't have been a case in the first place, and this court hearing of accounts should be dismissed and all previous documentations issued should be over-riled in light of the circumstance.

Give me a call if you need more information, but that should do,how long did it take, oh twenty minutes or so....:)

I will be putting more statements forward at a letter date, oh and by the way, the sinking of the planet doesn't effect me........I am sink-ing your sinking the future of our children, no?

I put more defence forward later, where are Arabian adverts gone, talk to my mahrams for all negotiations'.