Legal proceedings against the housing association for supplying the named person above, a door that wasn't requested. Thereafter at the time of correct instillation's', when in part, it was part of the contracted terms to respect the cultural identity of the person and or persons that they were supplying their brand of product to, and to fit the appropriate door of request at the exact time of the exchange, and that by going ahead to supply a door at not the required time, under the illegal pretence that they would return in two days to fit the appropriated door also breached the contracted statement of signed and authenticated request of the requested door, they thereafter breached the human rights act of the rights to privacy laws under the exchange of constructing instillation terms of agreements'.

Thereafter, subjecting the victim to a illegal suggestion that the mista ke would be rectified within a two day period, under false pretences', misleading the tenant into a agreement that they knew that they wouldn't up-hold.

Thereafter the named person above requested a fitted door with a small two panel glass back so that no other third party could gain access to the figure of the identity of the person inside the building of named fittings, also to protect the house from illegal entry, view age of self figure from the outside, illegal prying eyes' of perverse natures and more, subjecting the named person above to a faith discrimination, knowing that when they entered the home, they were entering a muslim house hold, and that by deliberating pretences perpetrated a criminal offence to openly uncover a veiled woman.

By ignorance of a cruel nature, and a laugh at the named person above expense.

Not thinking about the other consequences of natures on that person and or persons' when in the action of replacing the old door with a unrequested new door, that wasn't asked for and or requested in the selection process', and that, if they didn't have that brand and or any such named brand then why did they offer that door to the named victim above at the first hand, if they intended not to perpetrate a race crime against the faith essence of that person by intent and foul play.

We are suing.