Addressing the governments' policy on the new proposals of the implementation of a £25.00 pound reduction fee for those that have committed crimes against the services of national tax and contributions'.

It is with high concerns', in relation to the new penalty proposals', that is to be imposed on mostly young and or oldening men, who have family units to support, even if they are more then likely to have been separated from their families due to other influencing problematics of personality disorders', attitude grievances', family deaths', arguments and other, that may have caused a separation and many many more pendering family problems'.

In relation to this event of proposals', young and or older mothers' and children will be directly effected by such punishment implementations', too.

The reason I, (or my standing representative) suggest this, is because poorer members of society in relation to motherhood and pending family units', have such high value bills', such as gas, electricity, and computer valued operated control systematics' and more, that most households need extra support, because of other measures' that the government have imposed in relation to home based study units' as well as this and other monetary outlettng services', such as transport usage and more.

This alone, takes more then the amount of credits that the less fortunate and or less educated members of society can handle, leaving their children with the bare minimum of food resources' and many other items not attainable, the other funding and extra support comes from their separated partners', because of other reasons unbeknown to us.

In that, this vital £ 30.00 and or more, give a little extra ,of shopping and productive support to the family, by these unreliable men, give the women just that extra inflow to keep their families alive, well-fed and well-catered for, in other areas' such as cloths and etc.

And that, thereafter,they themselves, meaning the men, more often then not, leave them without further income of self support, also leaving them with less monetary gains' to support themselves in good clothing's and healthy eating habits to be able to attend and apply for better work resource and or better employment programmes', simply because, without a increase of the man's benefits', they can not maintain and or support themselves appropriately with other extra mouths to feed and or cloth , in supportive unit of outside influence to maintain family ties' of interests'.

And to help keep their kids out of the criminal enterprises', and again other reasons unbeknown to us.

With additional funding of a extra £30.00 pounds a week, they will be able to add support to their families', with partial interests of uni-fying of working towards a joining of marital ties once again and or other pending problematics' that may be able to be restored with the continual support of separated spouses'.

In that, they will be able to afford a little extra support for themselves', often they leave themselves hungry to add and or win back their women that they have separated from, causing them self harms and other vulnerabilities', like not being able to pay other bills' leaving themselves frozen and much worse still.

Oh its not a reality, is it?

Will that the general public of the poorer communities decide that then shell we?.