Tuesday, 25 October 2011

Conrad Murrey

The issues that the defence has, is that, Micheal was often sick with different illnesses' that set him apart from everyone else.

He was taking drugs for many years' and that, this more then likely, with 99.99% chance of affirmations', have upset his chemical balances', long before these regulated tests were taken.

And that, not having any prior history, and clean doctorate, why would he go about to do this, when he could have taken this action years ago, with other medicines' less detectable.

No comments:

Post a Comment