Tuesday, 7 December 2010

Mr Dverli

How is it, that the person who murdered the spouse of dverli, with a full confession, has thereafter, a full claim to the crime, without pressure and or being forced into an open confession, then confesses', as if it was a normal occurrence of such a crime, with no emotion and impartial to the judgement given, as if he was saying, ok I done it.

Thus passed, an immediate follow on confession of conspiracy to murder via a bribe, after a private-legal-assistant-with experience of counselling advice, thereafter immediate claims , another immediate claims of something completely different, in awe of the circumstance.
Therefore; the follow on statement should be dismissed as a false statement of accounts', and dropped as inadmissible.

No comments:

Post a Comment