Gay Coupling refused hotel accommodations'

We, as the owners of a well established business of clientele of years of established company outlet and consumer relationships', feel that by allowing the entrance of what could be possibly disturbing towards the current and pre-history relationship built up from our many years in the hotel industry, could impair us for years to come, eventually doing us out of business.

Simply, if you have a new reaction in a chain of industry, you will get either a negative response of forwarding reaction, and or a positive reaction of forwarding response.

In our case and location, we feel that we will be boycotted by our local clientele and that's why we chose to opt out of hosting a and the new arrival of a gay and or other gay couple entities, of what will inevitably destroy our small business outlet.

We understand that they wished to take vacation, but we refused on grounds' of an overall boycott of our industry, eventually falling into a demise of consumer and business outlett.

In regards to this matter, they, as a gay couple, know, that there are places that except such movements', why they swung down on us and our location, we do not know, the only reason we can summarise, is the fact that they wished for a publicity stunt, knowing our views' of such movement , because of our obvious location and whereabouts'.

As stated previously, they have resorts and outletts' at current, where they can reside, and due to our small franchise going into administrations', thats' why, and we will state again, chose not to entertain the rights to host such couples'.

Due to their irrational attacks on our outlett, and their demands to almost enforce us to accommodate them, we may see, now, the on-coming demise of our franchise, any way.

And we are completely fed up with their activism's', whereby they continuously are enforcing their views' on other peoples' belief systems'. There are millions of people, if not billions' of numbered people, who do not wish to share the same effective accommodations as gay couples', due to religious and or other independent views' of what they are also entitled to have under democratic society. Why should all of society agree to have these enforcements of gay couplings' and gay overviews imposed on them, when other religions are respectful of and most other identities in their community livings', and social outsetting spaces'.

Why do gay couples' not respect our rights of freedoms of response in relation to our beliefs'.

And that if they reside in a community whereby they know that on the whole, that community rejects such fundamental activism's' they should respect that by either the choice to move and relocate to an area whereby they will be accepted, or live as single identities' and go on vacation to places' whereby they can participate in what they desire under the acceptance of that area.

We are sick of their enforcements ON general society as a whole, by their enforced active campaigns'.