Abid Naseer

Abid Naseer - one of twelve Pakistani men, innocent until proven guilty - under- British Laws of human rights - of control, within the judicial services of the Rule of Law, arrested in a full day light raid, without conclusive evidences' prior to the arrest, the arrests went ahead anyway, reasons' for the forwarding of such an aggressive ambush and twelve issuing arrests'-non-applicable-at the time of issuing the individual rights' to remain silent.......and thereafter.....held for an intensive period of numbered days'.....until released into the custody of the immigration embassy of controls', thereby certified as innocent.

Mr Abid Naseer; Will, by justice of court hearing, be applying for, the rights to a full fair trail of all conclusive trails and evidences put forward, over the duration of prejudices, in relation to all pre history of accounting's of associations', with the handling of His case and defence.... there will not be room to discredit the first accounts of allegations brought forward.

During the trail to fight

Extradition

Mr Abid Naseer, will be obtaining full legal support, to apply for a complete damage of compensation to his and in relation to his well-being of natural confidences'.

As stated above, the consequences of such ignorant accounts' of behaviours by the force, has seen to the demise of his self confidence...that has also seen to the delay of legal representations to seek the appropriate defence solicitor in light of his circumstance.

The then pre - facts', were later to be found and documented and identified, as non-sufficient and or none-such-substance of obtaining the Rights to arrest...on the grounds' of what was later to be found....to match no such standing order of control.

A complete lack of irresponsibility's' - a condemnation of a group of people - and a sudden out burst of intrusions' of a aggressive ambush of none such substance of evidence in relation to the group.

Question: Is this acceptable ?

Answer: Completely - not !

Mr Abid Naseer

Under new solicitor-advice

By pre-order of the duration of all case related accounts

A order to-apply for compensation for the abuse suffered during this discriminatory operation against Mr Abid Naseer, a aggressive onslaught of abuse of Mr Abid's civil liberties', in light of the listed-stated-reasons above.

This has, by all fundamental accounts of insubstantial arrests' and internal-orders of racism' of a complete stigmatisation of the rights of Muslims' and or people who resemble the Muslim persona, examples' can be given of high consequence mistakes', where by shootings and killings of innocent people, have taken place in awe of a mistaken identity, in relation to a racial look and or appearance.

The first instance of accounts', went on to later impair Mr Abid Naseers'-confidence of self defence in relation to his innocence until proven guilty verdict, of court controls'.

The evidences' of innocence, later came to light-under an extensive court hearing, that inevitably saw the failings' of all inconclusive supports of forwarding papers from the existing prosecution, that had, not stated otherwise, that any one of those associations of friend-ties'-or mutual acquittance's, had actually been involved in any type category related topic of terrorism's'.

In fact - There was only one minor trace of substance, founds' in one location after numerous raids' across the board of friend ties'...this does not hold up, by any means, of accounts' to associated terrorism's'.

In fact, substances of chemicals, are frequently used in house holds' for reasons' of domesticated uses', and or car maintenance's and such.....how the police has concluded from one minor type A category substance ,a intensive operational link to terrorism, is completely untenable.

The mere fact of the matter is, it there was a high network of profile terrorists', the police would have found them, and all associated artifacts of incrimination's the first initial days of arrest and intensified investigations' on the apparently high profile suicidal terrorists' who were later handed directly over to immigrations' and released as innocent with =out non evidences of linked and of any type other evidences in relation to case facts'.

To the advance prosecution

The fact of the matter is:

There was no evidence to begin with

Had there been any such type A accounts of associational links' and ties' of terrorists', with such an apparent threat, as stated and issued by the police at the time of the first aggressive ambush on these innocent victims' of slander, it would have sufficed with immediate advances' of criminality's' of associations with mass evidences of trace evidences' everywhere.

That is far from the case, the individuals were under surveillance for numerous months', after the first initial arrests', without any formal apology at putting their identities; at risk of associational attacks', from people who had and or who formally knows' them, during the first raid, as a vigilante revenge-in co-related-response, to the activities' of the police co-ordinated unreasonable and irresponsible behaviours'.

As an acting solicitor for |Mr Abid Naseer, in light of the forwarding statement of advice in relation to -co-related events and timings' and other statements of response, in light of additional information, will be dismissing all impartial evidences with held by the prosecution, who has taken it upon themselves' to incriminate an individual without the rights' to a fair trail of defence system-non such evidences' without a written statement of forwarding faxes', that state exactly what and where, can then no longer be submitted in the court of law as permissible...without the named acting solicitor, previewing the apparent evidences of incrimination's at first hand.

Until then....i will be dismissing it as non substantial evidences made and out forward at an unfair advantage made by the forwarding prosecution , of what then makes the trail under the justice of powers, discriminatory and an unfair trail.

My client will uphold his legal rights to a fair trail, until proven otherwise, with substantial evidences, viewed by both parties of defence and prosecution, in his bid and my bid as an acting solicitor, to maintain his human rights of a just hearing - under the Democratic laws' of the United Kingdom.


In the mean time.....

We will be issuing a compensation claim and further advances to proceed a suing-campaign on discrimination and other type one category abuses of higher powers' of controls' in relation to Mr Abid Nasser...

On this....ending...we will be issuing a pre protection plan for the defendant to go into witness protection until further comply from the prosecution....who are looking to set the terms of conditions' without giving the correct rights to a far trail under the Judicial laws' of control..that have been established in light of a Fair Trail and Hearing without prejudice.....and pre condemnations'....before I, as an acting solicitor am able to bring about other profs that may and or may not.....relinquish Mr Abid naseer from his current position of imprisonment...

So until then..we would like the justice of court to issue a release into a witness protection programme immediately, in light of the forwarding statements' as an acting solicitor.....his life, under the circumstances'...of police powers' could be at further risk...due to this bias campaign to extradite Mr Abid Naseer.

Reasons for this request...I am sure the Judge will agree...are all listed in this issuing defence paper.....and therefore, under the circumstance, the Judge can quite clearly see, a miss-fit of appropriations' that have seen to a complete, almost boycott, by the police force....to even assume to admit, that they, in this case, have made an error.

And there is nothing wrong in being wrong, as long as pure justice of accounting and compensation is paid, to the people who have suffered harm, at the hands' of miss-appropriated-miss-leading advances and or informations, that led the police force, into a ambush that shouldn't have been carried out, in the first place.