Why is it?

Why is it; that after all the allegations' struck-up by neighbouring forces' of alliances', such as the MOD, The Police-Investigations'-Bureau, The International-Geneva-Conventions', The American-Affiliated-Constitution and Neighbouring-France; allowed to explicitly-detail all convicted detainees' identities' and detention purposes' of imprisonment with, unestablished-facts' of evidential substance, publish all documentations' in relation to innocent until proven guilty, having wronged the reputations' of the individuals in un-named-question, in regards to the detentions' of such personnel, for the rest of their lives' and other family members, ruined in such rumour mongering amongst apparently civilised-nations, but when One - Single- Member of their community from MOD or Police-Investigation Bureau is detained in custody for abuses' that have not yet come to light, in regards to evidences' and other matters of statements', that they with-hold name-identity and other documentations of personality in relation to his personal character. Safe-Guarding his identity in regards to his career, without even a blemish on his persona of conduct ions, be them true or not true.

If we are all involved in this, then the same introductory laws' should apply to the forces' of affiliated alliances, as to those who have been accused without factual evidence that they participated in any crime at all. That is not justice, that is complete biaism, where is the judicial-equality in that.