The burn the koran day, or Korea, as this is not the way the Qu'ran is spelt anyhow.

And that this racist is inciting a double and or even a triple act of past reenactment of race hatred amongst those nations of people that have worked so hard to establish them, from thousands of meetings, conferences, and from the effects of war its self.

The Koran that this racist is burning, is actually a benefit to us, as we do not believe that the translation' in other languages do not fit the actual language of Allah, and that it is only near to and not exactly.

However; this racist shouldn't have been allowed to have international coverage, to allow his small community to inflame such hatred across the global network of co-operation of nations', and that he should have been isolated from coverage, and band from all press related stories with a confiscation of his access to the Internet, thus stopping his deliberate incitement of white supremest campaign. That will lead on to other burnings of religious books'.

An eye for an eye and a book for a book, in the belief faith of the Christians', however, the Christan's shouldn't impose this view on people that live next to them, if their neighbours do not believe in the same principles' of their religious scriptations', as this is an enforced view of a different faith believe.

And that their views should be used within their communities, unless a DELIBERATED WITH EVIDENCE OF AN INCITEMENT HAS BEEN PERPETRATED BY A DIFFERENT FAITH GROUP WHO KNOW THE LAWS AND BELIEF OF THE OPPOSING FAITH.

If action is taken, by people who are not aware of the religious faith ordinations of the church, then it becomes a bias campaign of imposition of views', on everyone.

Thus; the Christians will write everything down, that their neighbours are doing, to incite this law on to unsuspecting other faith groups who haven't any idea that this is what they are doing, so lets all get our note books out and do the same, and then we will not be living, rather we will be breaking the privacy laws' treat thi neighbour as you would like to be treated, thus is not how I wish to be treated, so I dont do it. Is this a conflict of principle in scripture? However; if the church is writing done the actions of their neighbours, and small children who are not aware of and the reading of, and do not know the difference between right and wrong, until the age of puberty, then it is all conflictual. And that treat thi neighbour, is their principles', and because I do something you may not like, will you then conflict your views', to incite a spite campaign?


And thus every single action taken, Can become subject to review of an eye for an eye etc etc.

And to treat your neighbour well, is good, and that to ignore a deliberated incitement, is better in addition to treat your neighbour as you yourself would like to be treated.