No invitations' initially to discuss details'. Why?.

Goldsmith was a big player, he was up and held meetings' with, all the big players', he was an ultimate witness to all that was being presented, be them facts', or deliberate- persuasive means.

It was made very clear that there wasn't a need for a second inquiry; why?, there was a huge war, hanging in the balance, clearly, if there was doubts', about a second query, then clearly there should have been one.

How could a second query be deliberately- dismissed, under the table.

It was a complete, underhanded, one- sided call for war.

So; rather considering the effects' of discussions', made and seeking other opinions', MR Goldsmith decided it best just to follow the wolfs' to the slaughter. He knew his judgement would have been valid, in his own terms'.

They knew it to be unlawful, in their academic views' and reliance's', but they dismissed their diplomatic ties', and headed straight for war, with beautiful etiquette's of speech, such as a game, to see who can get away with a mass slaughter, on the terms' of using extreme very well presented terminology. Mass slaughter is mass slaughter, and there is no changing the wording of that, in corrections of correlations', in reviews and investigations', that were unfounded.

A mass murder took place and the world was made to stand back and just watch, there will be repercussions' for the tyrannies', that forced their own views' and lashes' out onto dormant peaceful dictators'.