Kurt Westergaard

Being placed in protective custody, after highly-offensive-religious-pictorials', of the Prophet Mohammad, Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him, being published worldwide.

This statement of review and account is in relation to the international laws', passed and regulated by the international standards agency of leading committees', regarding the safeguarding of the sanctimony of religious-decreed-laws', and or the stated laws of religious identities; that were passed through leading international governmental bodies', to outweigh the democratic freedoms policies of most libertarian people, who believe in the rights of any expressions', with no regard to causing high offensive and or even endangering there own lives, and the lives of their entire family of relatives', when in the process of doing so.....thus irresponsibility, and questions have to be raised in relation to the sanity of such people, who go beyond the set limitations of the laws', thus taking the laws into their own hands', and who hold such positions' of world ranking publications distributional rights'.

A law was passed years ago, in and through parliamentarians' of standing governments', whereby the governments themselves agreed, to respect certain and uphold certain individual religious rights' of respective religious orders', that neither set harm to any pending individual of legal residence.

That means', the Qu'ran of standing orders', would be followed up and respected, in addition to the co-existence and living alongside other religious identities' without imposing and or inflicting any religious laws' on the current communities of non practicing and or practising Muslims, that would then go on to see the inflicting of harm done and or created upon any of those individuals' in return of and in respect of the laws of the residing and land of current occupation and residence of that particular land, thus they would have the rights to practice all there religious folds', but would be exempt from harming anyone individual while doing so, be them Muslims in error, and or not.....as long as that muslim is doing what that Muslim is suppose to do, under the sight of Allah', then it became and becomes a self purity, and is a case of, see no evil, in your religious community, and or hear no evil, in your religious community, in relation to such legal laws' under the lands up in question, the rights to free sexual conduction's' before marriage......etc etc.

Of course, any Muslim then seen to be committing acts against the laws' of the land, would be held accountable for such things as shop lifting and other things', that could be reported and dealt with, within the co-existing laws' of Land in question and residence.

Therefore; to state, this law applies to all standing religious communities' living and residing in lands other then the Muslim lands themselves', and this was also agreed by governmental-Parliaments' and the standing laws' of and in relation to the sensitivity acts', regarding the international sanctimonious' of religious identities' and religious orders', act.

Therefore to state, that the newspapers' went above all proceedings of international laws', that have been seen to have been passed and agreed upon, in issuing the apparently comic pictorials', of the most extreme profanity, and provocative nature , of enticements of religious instigation's and causing high offence, and stimulating a chain of huge utter outrage, in and amongst the Muslim community worldwide, and other religious communities, that have felt the same effective instigation's', that have been allowed to slip through the religious sensitivities act, in relation to the lack of newspaper editors knowledge of such legal documentations being in existence, thus there are some legal factors that these individuals need to study before, being able to manage a newspaper enterprise of worldwide issuing'.

In relation to the fact that, the newspapers', lacked the comprehension to investigate the legitimacy of publications through the houses' of parliamentary laws' and orders', of what is usually the case, under the religious orders of sensitivity acts , they themselves were in legal error.

Thus; the religious people involved in a campaign of attempted assignations', against Kurt Westergaard, can not be held accountable for their actions', they were acting under and were under a state of delusional-temporary-religious-insanity, and should be extradited and released on compassionate grounds of religious identity, and also placed in a witness protection programme., and this is why the laws of religious sensitivities acts were passed in the first place.

And under that, the government was also in error, not to order a immediate withdrawal in relation to the cartoons', and the question has to be asked, if the governments dont know the international community laws' of Europe and the standing west, in relation to the above statement of accounts', or maybe, they were in awe of circumstance to brief and to young to remember such acts being passed.

And that, had the newspapers' acted legally, they would have known that they would have needed to challenge the religious sanctimonious laws', in furthering courts' to be able to issue and publish these cartoons'.

Therefore, the fault lays with un-professionalism's' on all counts', from all quarters', of not being versed in the laws' of the sanctimony's of the religious sensitivities act.