Jimmy Dimora
Looking at the evidance given, it appears that Jimmy was'nt acting alone, in that, when participating in public relations', how many hands are involved in third party issuse's of money extractings'.
That the money taken was for public improvements', and money exchanges were sent down through hands of employed staff and managements'.
This means that even tax distributions would be extracting funds under hidden shares of tax payments and other exclusive hands of inner powers', within this box we have, other people there-after extracing funds', and having money going missing in bodies of work employments', this fund, may have been used for external lunches', breaks and minor improvements to buildings and structures', while ploughing the rest of the funds back into the immidiate body of projects that were alloated to that positional building of people and community based projects', this means, when the check is received it goes to all immidiate needs' rather then going to just one body of project that would see left over fundings', when their buildings and place of work and under lunches' of payments were also being neglected.
A 30 year sentance seems extreme, considering that most evidance and other party people hands of managements are being wiped away and not even being looked at for a body of evidance that could see the case file squashed.
With formal statements given, to where and when the funds were spent,
bills gathered and or project resources and restorations and accounts of money funds'.
Looking at the evidance given, it appears that Jimmy was'nt acting alone, in that, when participating in public relations', how many hands are involved in third party issuse's of money extractings'.
That the money taken was for public improvements', and money exchanges were sent down through hands of employed staff and managements'.
This means that even tax distributions would be extracting funds under hidden shares of tax payments and other exclusive hands of inner powers', within this box we have, other people there-after extracing funds', and having money going missing in bodies of work employments', this fund, may have been used for external lunches', breaks and minor improvements to buildings and structures', while ploughing the rest of the funds back into the immidiate body of projects that were alloated to that positional building of people and community based projects', this means, when the check is received it goes to all immidiate needs' rather then going to just one body of project that would see left over fundings', when their buildings and place of work and under lunches' of payments were also being neglected.
A 30 year sentance seems extreme, considering that most evidance and other party people hands of managements are being wiped away and not even being looked at for a body of evidance that could see the case file squashed.
With formal statements given, to where and when the funds were spent,
bills gathered and or project resources and restorations and accounts of money funds'.
No comments:
Post a Comment