Dog Insurance

It is a ridiculous law to impose a dog insurance scheme, for the walking of dogs', and or ownership.

As citizens' we have to pay for T.V licences'; that should insure responsible-adult-usage, but because the stations' take it upon themselves' to over-ride censorship; the over-all effects' of what the ; licence is suppose to do, has failed.

As citizens' we have to pay this ridiculous fee! Of what other-T.V reportings' have just been as successful; without prejudice, to other-networking reporting. It is a ridiculous claim that the B-bc;(separated encase of reprisals') is the best reporting network in existence.

Now you are proposing a insurance scheme for such animals' as dangerous-as what could be, and is as, potential and already evident and living attacks' on general and over-all members' of society.

It would be better to impose a licence for owners' of such an animal, that would insure a course of training and theory tests'.

It seems' hypocritical that you wouldn't do this, as such things' as driving, T.V, Knife and Gun ownership all have a very good standard of licence training.

A dog can be just as lethal as any of the above weapons' vehicles' and or, T.V usage. Not only are they a hazard in social circles' and to children they are also a environmentally-hygienic-wise, a social-pesticide, to the well-fare of children and general public. However a good course of training and licencing would resolve all issues' concerning the usage of dog and dog owner-ship.

And when dog owners' pass their training, the licence; inspections' of homes' should also be included in the measure of owner-ship.

If the home is well-cared-for, then it is more then likely the dog will not be abandoned and left as a stray.