It is with regret :

It is with empathy, that an unjust- judiciary; that had little, or no understanding, of Islamic concepts', could expel and condemn a Imam, on preaching the injustices'; of what and still is, an unrealistic oppressive regime, and or occupation; of the extremest-unorthodox, Jews'. Of what I might reiterate, have nothing what- so-ever, to do with the Hebrew concepts', of religious and Holy law.

A Imam, with family ties', has had to resettle, with apparent separation of all family units', and has been isolated to the hardship of the hills', in the republic of Jamaica. It is with solice that an unjust and bias board, has equally refuted his presentation and honest announcements', that he was, preaching against a unfair, oppressive state, of what is recognised, on the wordily stage, as murderous and dictatorial at times'.

It would be in his interest to return to the UN, to be reunited with his family ties', and live in a way that he has become accustomed to. It seems' too much of a radicalisation and Islamic phobia to expel him for, mis-interpretation and hate crimes', that is apparently and clearly, not what he was preaching, at the first hand.

Justice needs' to be given, on the mis-understanding of the preaching, of the historical facts', of an oppressive regime.

It is with evidence that, peace activists' and other members' of religious sections', have protested against the Jewish unorthodox means' of holding the state of Palestine at ransome, consumption of lives' and many deaths' have been lost in all due respect, and the Hebrew people are aware of some of the above facts', as from their point of view, as being authentic and correct.