I'm sorry i cant be with you right now, are you all still participating in the Mensa IQ test of memory and repetitive programme from my previous year.......and next year, I have something even better planned.....:)

I would usually keep to a seven day proposal of word promises' , but seen that you are extremely pressuring me, then you leave me no option but to put my defence forward, I will be defending the rights of Conrad Murry and a appeal of innocent until proven otherwise, with full adequate body of evidence that this man is completely guilty of the crime set out against him as proposed ,murder and or homicide.

Facts stated and misappropriated in the courts of law, in a misleading context that haven't been added and or have been left out by the prosecution, by deliberated pretences', by the, against jury hosting a programme against Conrad Murry, important facts that could change the verdict with a swift pace of descriptive writing explanations', thus the next stated facts will be placed forward in light of Conrad Murry's defence programme of forwarding solicitor statements' of accounts', with sound proofing that he was the sole benefactor to the death of Micheal Jackson, without justification to accuse the defendant of this crime. A crime that can foresee the death penalty imposition installed.

1. There was a first autopsy on Micheal Jackson, results withheld from the defence party in relation to Conrad Murry.
1.The family requested that a full autopsy by, yet another coroner, meaning that a full autopsy of the body had been done and completed already.

2. Without satisfaction of these result the family sort to arrange for another independent autopsy coroner to carry out yet another full investigative autopsy that once again bared none conclusive results of homicide, meaning that, the appropriated independent, best solicitor coronor was appointed from this aerial town to carry this autopsy out, foul played was entirely ruled out on both occasions of detailed laboratory consults of the medical profession. In fact, the second autopsy showed that there was no trauma suffered and or no foul played found when he and his team investigated the preserved body of Micheal Jackson.

4. And that, the prosecution are not versed in the medical profession, and that they are only putting forward testimonial witnesses', of other patient doctorate accounts that have no apparent barrings on this case out hand.

5. After this statement was issued and the examination results were passed to and on on to other official members of councils' and tribunals' that are also little in versed medical readings and doctorate papers', rather their association is with the town halls' and other laws of justice systems', that pass own verdicts of self opinionated documentations of statements that are highly invalid, in such case' therefore to state, with the two autopsy's already carried out on Micheal Jackson, both concluding same non foul play and or other stated terms of non corrupting handling's', there shouldn't have been a case in the first place, and this court hearing of accounts should be dismissed and all previous documentations issued should be over-riled in light of the circumstance.

Give me a call if you need more information, but that should do,how long did it take, oh twenty minutes or so....:)

I will be putting more statements forward at a letter date, oh and by the way, the sinking of the planet doesn't effect me........I am sink-ing your sinking the future of our children, no?

I put more defence forward later, where are Arabian adverts gone, talk to my mahrams for all negotiations'.

i would love to see it snow this side of the year, can you arrange that for me...... with love/

I believe their are male practitioners needed in this location, thank you.

Court action

Relation to teeth, the first set of bottom molars'(both), at 11 years had abbreviated minor plaque......on request, I asked for minor treatment of this, whereby the plaque would be removed and the small cavities of be filled with the materials that they filled the teeth with at that particular time in history.

the dentist himself, refused to do this, I recall, and that I did mention this, with a assistant present, that I might have on going trouble with these first two molars' if the treatment was not done at that particular time, the dentist refused, stating that no further action for these teeth was needed.
In that, by the time I was in my twenties', I was left with abases that erupted during pregnancy that could have led to septicemia.

The dental practice was based at and on the Woolworth road location.....

Because of this non action not taken at the appropriate time, I lost one tooth and Am having on-going problems with the other lower molar that they are now refusing to treat.....in all intents and by perpetration's', that if it becomes infected and Leeds to septicemia, their are again going to be held liable again.


And that, several men are need on this premises' my case worker knows the location, I look forward to doing business with you.

In that, if the dental practitioner, took the appropriate action at the appropriate time, I would still have a perfect set of teeth, meaning that no accidents and or other causes have harmed my dental mouth structure of my set of present teeth.

Thank you, I look forward to hearing from you.

On the left hand side,that is.

Now, in relation to the dental practice that I have recently signed up with, talk to my negotiators', tell him, meaning the dentist and or practitioner, i am willing to take legal action, if my demands are not met.

I will not be taking on any new cases for seven days', due to resting needs', in that time, I will be energy saving.

I do know that there are hundreds of thousands of cases; that need addressing, well its not as if i am going anywhere to fast, is it.

In that, I request that you have patients', its not as easy as I make it look.

La' layla ana con'don'et' hada fy, my opinion.